Just saw the March AHIMA article – not sure if it should read ICD-10 or ICD-11. With ICD-11 due in a few years, I would favor the move from “9″ to “11″. Start now, finish strong.
Filed under: classifications | Tagged: icd10
Just saw the March AHIMA article – not sure if it should read ICD-10 or ICD-11. With ICD-11 due in a few years, I would favor the move from “9″ to “11″. Start now, finish strong.
Filed under: classifications | Tagged: icd10
Hi,
I agree with going straight from I-10 to I-11 to give us more time and be ahead of the when I-11 comes out. In my HIM graduate program, a student did a study on I-11 and I-10 and what she was finding out was that there are not really a lot of differences between the two.